<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>notdotq &#187; memories of eternity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://not.dotq.org/tag/memories-of-eternity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://not.dotq.org</link>
	<description>Five Words: You Can't Censor My Love</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 01:42:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://not.dotq.org/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>a comment on eternal’s “definitive piece on Honey and Clover”</title>
		<link>http://not.dotq.org/2009/08/02/a-comment-on-eternals-definitive-piece-on-honey-and-clover/</link>
		<comments>http://not.dotq.org/2009/08/02/a-comment-on-eternals-definitive-piece-on-honey-and-clover/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 09:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lolikitsune</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invective]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memories of eternity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://not.dotq.org/?p=1752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[_eternal, no hard feelings. I like you, I like your blog, I want to keep it that way. First, for the unaware, direct your attention to A Thematic Analysis of Honey &#038; Clover, a spoiler-ful post by our buddy eternal. For now let&#8217;s leave aside the fact that the &#8216;analysis&#8217; doesn&#8217;t really focus on themes, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>_eternal, no hard feelings. I like you, I like your blog, I want to keep it that way. </p>
<p>First, for the unaware, direct your attention to <a href="http://blog.ephemeraleternity.com/analysis/a-thematic-analysis-of-honey-and-clover">A Thematic Analysis of Honey &#038; Clover</a>, a spoiler-ful post by our buddy eternal. For now let&#8217;s leave aside the fact that the &#8216;analysis&#8217; doesn&#8217;t really focus on themes, and let&#8217;s examine the meaning of the word &#8216;analysis.&#8217; First of all, a quote from the comments section, by the post author himself:</p>
<blockquote><p>I know it sounds cliche, but I honestly think that the show itself wrote this blog post. </p></blockquote>
<p>The nerve! (I&#8217;ll get back to this later. **)</p>
<p>Let me explain to you what an &#8216;analysis&#8217; is: an analysis is a detailed examination of something, with scrutiny being the most important player. Now let me explain to you what a &#8216;reading&#8217; is: a reading is what you get out of a work when you consume it.</p>
<p>Remember something called &#8216;book reports?&#8217; Those things we did back in grade school, &#8220;read this book and write a page about it?&#8221; Yeah. Book reports involve consuming a work and then translating your reading of that work onto a sheet of paper.</p>
<p>Analysis is more than that, eternal.</p>
<p>I appreciated your book report on Honey &#038; Clover.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to go write an essay.</p>
<p>** And now for the final blow, going back to the quote of eternal&#8217;s. Breaking news: analysis doesn&#8217;t write itself. If your post writes itself, then it&#8217;s just the stuff you&#8217;re taking away from the show at first glance. If you&#8217;re getting anywhere deeper than the surface of the show, you&#8217;re putting in some effort. Your book report is only as valuable as the depth of your reading, and your reading isn&#8217;t deep if your book report wrote itself.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll say this right now: a post that merely summarizes the characters and their struggles, employing such beautiful turns of speech as &#8220;it&#8217;s as simple as that,&#8221; can never be the definitive piece on any work.</p>
<p>Sorry, eternal, <i>the objection wrote itself.</i></p>
<p>And now a promise, lest I seem too much the angry troll: expect at least two posts coming in the not-too-distant future, one on an assortment of smiles, insert songs, hard-boiled eggs, and honey sandwiches, and the other on Morita Shinobu and how his backstory episode is a useless piece of tripe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://not.dotq.org/2009/08/02/a-comment-on-eternals-definitive-piece-on-honey-and-clover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

