<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ethics; Infinite Ryvius 01</title>
	<atom:link href="http://not.dotq.org/2009/02/22/ethics-infinite-ryvius-01/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://not.dotq.org/2009/02/22/ethics-infinite-ryvius-01/</link>
	<description>Five Words: You Can't Censor My Love</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 20:52:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lelangir</title>
		<link>http://not.dotq.org/2009/02/22/ethics-infinite-ryvius-01/#comment-44631</link>
		<dc:creator>lelangir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://not.dotq.org/?p=1529#comment-44631</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-44610&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;jp_zer0&lt;/a&gt;: yeah (re; my above comment) when I meant &quot;immediate effects&quot; - which is more or less an oxymoron - I meant &quot;the morality which is inseparable from the deed&quot;, so thanks for those nifty devices for judging acts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-44610" rel="nofollow">jp_zer0</a>: yeah (re; my above comment) when I meant &#8220;immediate effects&#8221; &#8211; which is more or less an oxymoron &#8211; I meant &#8220;the morality which is inseparable from the deed&#8221;, so thanks for those nifty devices for judging acts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lelangir</title>
		<link>http://not.dotq.org/2009/02/22/ethics-infinite-ryvius-01/#comment-44613</link>
		<dc:creator>lelangir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://not.dotq.org/?p=1529#comment-44613</guid>
		<description>nazarielle: if I were in this situation I&#039;d probably take the pragmatic route, given a lack of peer pressure... (and a bastard is a bastard perhaps?)

ik: I forgot to say (due to poor articulation) was that in deontology, the immediate ethics are inseparable from the act (I think?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nazarielle: if I were in this situation I&#8217;d probably take the pragmatic route, given a lack of peer pressure&#8230; (and a bastard is a bastard perhaps?)</p>
<p>ik: I forgot to say (due to poor articulation) was that in deontology, the immediate ethics are inseparable from the act (I think?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp_zer0</title>
		<link>http://not.dotq.org/2009/02/22/ethics-infinite-ryvius-01/#comment-44610</link>
		<dc:creator>jp_zer0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://not.dotq.org/?p=1529#comment-44610</guid>
		<description>@Lelangir

You should never talk about Effects or Consequences when having a Deontological interpretation, Lelangir. What&#039;s important is the intention of the moral act.

In this case though, neglecting to save a life will pass the &quot;universalisability test&quot; (If everyone neglected to save lives...), therefore we have no absolute moral duty to save lives. 

It would be an imperfect duty, where those acts are those we wished would be universalized.

@IKnight

I&#039;m sure they&#039;re saying a lot of funny stuff. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lelangir</p>
<p>You should never talk about Effects or Consequences when having a Deontological interpretation, Lelangir. What&#8217;s important is the intention of the moral act.</p>
<p>In this case though, neglecting to save a life will pass the &#8220;universalisability test&#8221; (If everyone neglected to save lives&#8230;), therefore we have no absolute moral duty to save lives. </p>
<p>It would be an imperfect duty, where those acts are those we wished would be universalized.</p>
<p>@IKnight</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;re saying a lot of funny stuff. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IKnight</title>
		<link>http://not.dotq.org/2009/02/22/ethics-infinite-ryvius-01/#comment-44521</link>
		<dc:creator>IKnight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://not.dotq.org/?p=1529#comment-44521</guid>
		<description>What do the virtue ethicists say?

@ Owen S: I think the key difference is that in &lt;em&gt;Infinite Ryvius&lt;/em&gt;&#039;s first episode, it&#039;s just &#039;a person&#039; - the potential rescuers don&#039;t know who it is. In HF Shirou knows Sakura very well (in the Biblical sense, I cannot resist adding). If he didn&#039;t know her well, the dilemma might be less challenging. Whereas the rescuers in &lt;em&gt;IR&lt;/em&gt; are being tested as citizens facing intellectual and emotional attachments to [the idea of] an unknown fellow-citizen, not to a family member.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do the virtue ethicists say?</p>
<p>@ Owen S: I think the key difference is that in <em>Infinite Ryvius</em>&#8216;s first episode, it&#8217;s just &#8216;a person&#8217; &#8211; the potential rescuers don&#8217;t know who it is. In HF Shirou knows Sakura very well (in the Biblical sense, I cannot resist adding). If he didn&#8217;t know her well, the dilemma might be less challenging. Whereas the rescuers in <em>IR</em> are being tested as citizens facing intellectual and emotional attachments to [the idea of] an unknown fellow-citizen, not to a family member.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nazarielle</title>
		<link>http://not.dotq.org/2009/02/22/ethics-infinite-ryvius-01/#comment-44486</link>
		<dc:creator>Nazarielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://not.dotq.org/?p=1529#comment-44486</guid>
		<description>What happens when you&#039;re just a bastard and don&#039;t care about people&#039;s lives? :p

Honestly, if I think about this for too long I just end up going in circles, which leads me to believe that I&#039;d probably be indecisive even when someone&#039;s life was in danger, in a case like you described.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens when you&#8217;re just a bastard and don&#8217;t care about people&#8217;s lives? :p</p>
<p>Honestly, if I think about this for too long I just end up going in circles, which leads me to believe that I&#8217;d probably be indecisive even when someone&#8217;s life was in danger, in a case like you described.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lelangir</title>
		<link>http://not.dotq.org/2009/02/22/ethics-infinite-ryvius-01/#comment-44450</link>
		<dc:creator>lelangir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://not.dotq.org/?p=1529#comment-44450</guid>
		<description>db: no &quot;thesis&quot; for this post really

owen: are you implicitly telling me to play fsn? perhaps over spring break...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>db: no &#8220;thesis&#8221; for this post really</p>
<p>owen: are you implicitly telling me to play fsn? perhaps over spring break&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owen S</title>
		<link>http://not.dotq.org/2009/02/22/ethics-infinite-ryvius-01/#comment-44439</link>
		<dc:creator>Owen S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 03:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://not.dotq.org/?p=1529#comment-44439</guid>
		<description>So this dilemma like Fate/stay night, Heaven&#039;s Feel route?

***START HEAVEN&#039;S FEEL SPOILERS***

In F/sn, the first two routes (Fate, Unlimited Blade Works) are spent fleshing out Shirou&#039;s character--he likes to save people. In fact, he wants to be a superhero, as per mirror moon&#039;s translation of &#039;seigi no mikata&#039;, and F/sn spends about 40-60 hours educating us about this.

Then Heaven&#039;s Feel happens. HF is basically Nasu&#039;s foil to the superhero bullshit that Shirou&#039;s made of in the first two routes--or, in the words of Ga-Rei Zero, &quot;Would you kill someone you love because of love?&quot;.

Admittedly, Nasu juxtaposes ideals and reality in F/sn into a sort-of dichotomy in order for us to truly see the dilemma as it is and not just someone else&#039;s problem, but the way it&#039;s done is absolutely brilliant. Not just the scene where you&#039;re forced to kill Saber (a symbolic representation of the ideals that Shirou holds) in order to save Sakura, but just about everything--from the point where the news is broken to Shirou about Sakura being &lt;strike&gt;Abyssal One&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;strike&gt;Cthulu&lt;/strike&gt; the one behind the nightly massacres to the various other conflicts ranging from internal (To kill or not to kill, that is the question!), interpersonal (v.s. Rin) to external (v.s. Dark Sakura, and Kotomine)--all of them do the same thing in challenging Shirou&#039;s ideals, and HF is all the better for it.

This is what makes HF &lt;i&gt;the&lt;/i&gt; route, and not just for its gratuitous porn or grand scale of action--it forces Shirou, and by extension you as the reader/viewer to make a choice between the principles that make Shirou what he is and the girl he loves.

***END HEAVEN&#039;S FEEL SPOILERS***</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So this dilemma like Fate/stay night, Heaven&#8217;s Feel route?</p>
<p>***START HEAVEN&#8217;S FEEL SPOILERS***</p>
<p>In F/sn, the first two routes (Fate, Unlimited Blade Works) are spent fleshing out Shirou&#8217;s character&#8211;he likes to save people. In fact, he wants to be a superhero, as per mirror moon&#8217;s translation of &#8216;seigi no mikata&#8217;, and F/sn spends about 40-60 hours educating us about this.</p>
<p>Then Heaven&#8217;s Feel happens. HF is basically Nasu&#8217;s foil to the superhero bullshit that Shirou&#8217;s made of in the first two routes&#8211;or, in the words of Ga-Rei Zero, &#8220;Would you kill someone you love because of love?&#8221;.</p>
<p>Admittedly, Nasu juxtaposes ideals and reality in F/sn into a sort-of dichotomy in order for us to truly see the dilemma as it is and not just someone else&#8217;s problem, but the way it&#8217;s done is absolutely brilliant. Not just the scene where you&#8217;re forced to kill Saber (a symbolic representation of the ideals that Shirou holds) in order to save Sakura, but just about everything&#8211;from the point where the news is broken to Shirou about Sakura being <strike>Abyssal One</strike> <strike>Cthulu</strike> the one behind the nightly massacres to the various other conflicts ranging from internal (To kill or not to kill, that is the question!), interpersonal (v.s. Rin) to external (v.s. Dark Sakura, and Kotomine)&#8211;all of them do the same thing in challenging Shirou&#8217;s ideals, and HF is all the better for it.</p>
<p>This is what makes HF <i>the</i> route, and not just for its gratuitous porn or grand scale of action&#8211;it forces Shirou, and by extension you as the reader/viewer to make a choice between the principles that make Shirou what he is and the girl he loves.</p>
<p>***END HEAVEN&#8217;S FEEL SPOILERS***</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digitalboy</title>
		<link>http://not.dotq.org/2009/02/22/ethics-infinite-ryvius-01/#comment-44431</link>
		<dc:creator>digitalboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 03:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://not.dotq.org/?p=1529#comment-44431</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad I checked and saw this was lelangir because I was about to be seriously pissed if this was the first lolikit post in forever.

Anyway, awesome post, I think, even though I&#039;m not sure what point you&#039;re trying to make... or maybe i should say, &#039;I don&#039;t think the show disagrees with you.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad I checked and saw this was lelangir because I was about to be seriously pissed if this was the first lolikit post in forever.</p>
<p>Anyway, awesome post, I think, even though I&#8217;m not sure what point you&#8217;re trying to make&#8230; or maybe i should say, &#8216;I don&#8217;t think the show disagrees with you.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lelangir</title>
		<link>http://not.dotq.org/2009/02/22/ethics-infinite-ryvius-01/#comment-44417</link>
		<dc:creator>lelangir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 02:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://not.dotq.org/?p=1529#comment-44417</guid>
		<description>pragmaticism/consequentialism/obersteinism come to the same conclusion in this context</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pragmaticism/consequentialism/obersteinism come to the same conclusion in this context</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

